🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with health policies. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be lowered to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

International experts specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, they said, adding that minors should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which involves rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.