🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are paid to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to remove African American heritage and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.