🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.